I sometimes wonder if that
phrase describes our house – a hutch too far.
It’s like a bridge too far, only with furniture. In case your World War II history is a little
rusty, British Lieutenant-General Frederick Browning (commander of the British
airborne forces and – this is really cool – the husband of Daphne du Maurier; Rebecca,
I love that novel) coined the phrase.
During the planning for Operation Market Garden, he reportedly said, “I
think we may be going a bridge too far” when discussing how long his troops
could hold a bridge in the Netherlands.
Whether it’s overreaching to
have three hutches in one house, I don’t know, but at least our hutches are working
successfully, unlike the Allies’ 1944 military operation. Last month, I shared our dining room hutch
with you, the one I call the curiosity cabinet because it contains numerous
little tchotchkes and keepsakes in addition to dishes.
![]() |
| Dining room Back porch |
![]() |
| Living room |
Our third hutch, the only
one we actually purchased, sits in our living room. And, baby, it is big. It is a little more than seven feet tall, five
feet wide, and nineteen inches deep. All
one piece. It is murder to move. We bought it at an antiques store in
Walworth, Wisconsin after we moved out of our city condo to a small-town
house. It houses our flow blue china,
Fiesta Ware, table linens, candles, and other odds and ends.
![]() |
| A peek inside. The bottom drawer hold croquet balls and Eiffel Towers. Hmmm. |
If we ever downsize from
this old house, no doubt we won’t be able to keep all three of the
hutches. It would be tough to decide
which to keep and which to let go. Not
exactly a Sophie’s choice (in keeping with my World War II references), but a
hard decision nevertheless. Do you have
a similar problem with too many chairs or tables that you can’t or don't want to get rid
of?


